论文全文 - 第28届CIMAC会议 未指定分类
该论文已在芬兰赫尔辛基举行的第28届CIMAC大会上发表。论文的版权归CIMAC所有。One of the best methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions of thermal energy generation systems is to use wastederived fuels. In Finland, high-quality liquid engine fuels are produced from various wastes, e.g., animal fats, biproducts of forest industry, and wastes of food industry.
In this study, three different liquid renewable fuels were investigated in a turbo-charged, intercooled common-rail nonroad diesel engine. The fuels were animal fat based methyl ester (AFME), hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), and biodiesel from fish wastes (FISH). As the baseline fuel, commercial low-sulfur diesel fuel oil (DFO) was used. The engine was designed to fulfill the US Tier 3 emissions legislation.
The engine was driven according to the 8-mode cycle C1 of the ISO8178 standard. In addition to the basic engine performance and regulated gaseous emissions, the exhaust smoke and particulate number emissions were determined.
For all studied fuels, similar rated engine output and maximum torque were used. Due to the lower volumetric heating values, the injection periods were at some loads slightly longer for AFME, FISH and HVO relative to DFO. No deliberate modifications were, however, made for the injection strategy.
The smoke emissions were the lowest with AFME and FISH, both of which showing very similar results. DFO emitted the highest smoke and the results of HVO were between those of DFO and esters. At low load at rated speed, HVO showed, however, almost as low smoke readings as AFME and FISH.
At high loads, FISH produced the highest NOx emissions, HVO usually showing the lowest NOx. At maximum torque, the NOx with HVO was more than 20% lower compared with FISH. At rated speed, DFO was almost as favorable as HVO but at very low load the NOx was slightly the highest with HVO.
Regarding CO emissions within the upper half load range, there were no big differences between the fuels, the esters having slightly the lowest recordings at 75% and full loads at intermediate speed. At low loads, HVO was the most beneficial concerning CO emissions.
At rated speed, DFO produced the highest HC emissions, HVO, AFME and FISH showing lower but almost equal results each. At intermediate speed, HVO and FISH emitted the lowest HC, AFME being slightly less favorable and DFO again showing the highest HC.
The highest particulate number (PN) emissions were measured with DFO, the peak value usually detected within a particle size range of 50 to 70 nm. The lowest PN was generally recorded with FISH, but AFME showed almost similar results. With the esters, the highest PN was often approximately 50% of that with DFO. Commonly, the highest PN with HVO was halfway between DFO and esters.
At idle, the particle size distributions were, however, completely different. FISH produced clearly the highest emissions and HVO the lowest. As a whole, the benefit of HVO was very clearly seen just at idle.
The brake thermal efficiencies were almost equal throughout the test cycle. At high loads at intermediate speed, AFME and FISH showed slightly higher efficiencies than HVO and particularly DFO, but the differences were almost within the range of the measurement accuracy.
The study showed that oxygen containing waste-derived esters may form a feasible option for local energy production and off-road use, particularly when used as blends with fossil DFO. Moreover, the advantages of the high-quality renewable HVO fuel were especially clearly seen in low-load engine operation conditions.
查看